The legal theory used to support an employer's hiring practices that disproportionately impact a group of people is known as "business necessity." The reasoning stems from the notion that a business may have justifications for using such stringent hiring policies.
Practices driven by business necessity are very prevalent today. The following are some instances of hiring practices that may be shielded by the exigencies of business:
Businesses must provide convincing proof that the excluding criteria are only connected to work performance and do not have a disproportionate impact in order to demonstrate business necessity.
Since that case, important elements have surfaced that can be used to evaluate the legality of hiring and employment practices. Employers must be able to demonstrate these factors:
Influencing employment decisions based on discrimination of age, sex, ethnicity, and disability is prohibited and discriminatory. Due to these unethical, discriminatory methods, employers are forced to make assumptions and generalizations about applicants based on those indisputable traits.
Of course, very few companies will purposefully discriminate on the basis of necessity. HR professionals should be able to respond to the questions given above and demonstrate that their company's recruiting policies are not discriminatory in any form to best prevent any unintentional prejudice. Writing down the company's hiring processes and incorporating policies and procedures that forbid discrimination during the employment process.
A legal theory known as "business necessity" can be used to defend an employer's choice to adopt hiring practices that disproportionately disadvantage one group of people. This theory is predicated on the idea that the employer has a good reason to do so, given the needs of the business. These recruiting criteria are allowed when they can be proven to be "job-related and compatible with business necessity," even though the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) normally forbids the use of hiring criterion that has a disproportionate impact. In other words, organizations must be able to show that the standards they employ are essential to their organizations’ smooth operation.